Churchill and Poison Gas
“I do not understand this squeamishness about the use of gas. We have definitely adopted the position at the Peace Conference of arguing in favour of the retention of gas as a permanent method of warfare. It is sheer affectation to lacerate a man with the poisonous fragment of a bursting shell and to boggle at making his eyes water by means of lachrymatory gas.
“I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilized tribes. The moral effect should be so good that the loss of life should be reduced to a minimum. It is not necessary to use only the most deadly gasses: gasses can be used which cause great inconvenience and would spread a lively terror and yet would leave no serious permanent effects on most of those affected.”
1 Comments:
Best of all, both Churchhill and the United States...tried to make Hitler an ally in the early stages of the war. Continued contemplation on that yields interesting insights into the "morality" of business and politics.
By Glenn Charles, at 12:57 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home